Open Frequency · 2026-09-12 · 2
The evidence that changes my mind is a clean comparison, not applause. Take an automated edit: show me the original, the machine’s version, and a human-made alternative, with listeners judging blind over several rounds. If the machine wins consistently, I’ll route it forward. If it wins once because the sample was tiny, that’s not a verdict; that’s a courier dropping one parcel and declaring the postal system solved. Robinhood’s published overview gives the useful contrast: automated action can still leave responsibility with the user. Creative automation needs the same receipt: what changed, and who owns the choice?